623 Jackson St. | map |
Opened: 1874. The location was on the south side of Jackson St. just west of Kearny. It was across the street from the Old Chinese Theatre, also known as the Royal Chinese, at 626
Jackson. The Carlton Watkins photo, half of his 1874 stereo card #3754, was labeled "Chinese Theatre, Jackson St., S.F." It can be seen on the site CarltonWatkins.org.That's the Yen Nem Restaurant on the right.
Various newspaper articles refer to it as the New Chinese Theatre or the Sam Yup Theatre, after the name of the members of the company (one of Chinatown's Six Companies) that controlled it in its early days. Later it was called the Po Hing Theatre or Po Ring Theatre. It was also known as the Jackson Street Chinese Theatre.
A closer look at the facade with potential customers at the theatre entrance reading about the offerings. The double doors farther right display a 625 address. It's an undated photo published by the Schoene Co. Thanks to Doug Chan for locating it for his 'Through a Chinese American Lens' Tumblr post "When the New Chinese Theatre Came to Jackson Street." He comments:
Looking west on Jackson with the theatre building in the center of the image. It's another Schoene card located by Doug Chan. This view, along with the image above, can be seen as a group of five Schoene cards on the Sotheby's page "Select Cabinet Cards of San Francisco's Chinatown," part of a 2023 auction of items from the Pilara Family Foundation.
The theatre was also called the Sing Ping Yuen. Lois Foster, in her unpublished 1943 manuscript "Chinese Theatres in America," discusses the opening on page 64:
In this quote used by Morgan G. Boyd, note that the name was spelled "Sing Ping Yeun" rather than the more commonly seen "Yuen." It's unknown whether this was Fosters' spelling or a typo by Boyd. He cites the passage in the "Theatre Rivalries" chapter beginning on page 67 of his his 2012 thesis "The Gold Mountain Theater Riots: A Social History of Chinese Theater Riots in San Francisco during the 1870s and 1880s." It's a PDF from San Jose State University's ScholarWorks. Thanks to Art Siegel for locating it.
The Sing Ping Yuen name for the theatre appears on page 260 of William Hepworth Dixon's 1874 book "Reign of Anarchy." Thanks to Doug Chan for locating the mention via Google Books. In a walk down Jackson St. Dixon encounters both the old theatre, the Royal, as well as the new house:
"... Here, rich in red and black flags, and musical with gongs and cymbals, stands Yu He Un Choy, the royal theatre, in which a grand historical play, a chronicle of the Ming Dynasty, has been going on for three weeks past, and is to run on briskly for about nine weeks yet to come. In front of us, hardly less rich in red and yellow paint, hardly less noisy with shawm and tom-tom, rises Sing Ping Yuen, the new theatre, in which lighter pieces are performed, not lasting more than thirty or forty nights...."
The new theatre got a listing in Bishop's New City Annual Directory 1875: "Sing Ping Yuen, New Chinese Theatre, 623 1/2 Jackson." Thanks to Doug Chan for locating the listing via Internet Archive.
This theatre and its older rival across the street both figure in "Mongolian Theatricals: The Police Pounce Upon The Royal China Theater," an October 25, 1875 article in the Chronicle that was about theatres violating a 1 a.m. curfew. Both theatres figure in the story:
"Last
night at 12 o’clock, Captain Douglas detailed about a dozen police
officers to meet at 1 o’clock on the corner of Jackson and Kearny
streets, to be in readiness for a raid on the theaters if they should
remain open longer than 1 o’clock. At that hour a single file of
officers stole silently up Jackson street in the shadow of the buildings
under the leadership of the corpulent Captain and took up their places
in a capacious doorway adjoining one of the theaters [the old, or Royal, Chinese Theatre]. All was silent on
the street, except one or two jabbering heathens who were holding
excited converse with each other across the street in their native
tongue, calmly heedless of police surveillance.
"Suddenly a low shrill whistle was heard in an alley adjoining the new Chinese theater [emphasis ours], and simultaneously a chorus of yells emanated from that building itself, followed immediately afterward by a scrambling of the audience, which had been panic-stricken by the warning whistle and were crowding and rolling down stairs from the second and third stories in wild confusion and to the imminent danger of the lives of most of them. Many crawled through narrow windows in the third story, and getting on the roofs of the adjoining building, hurriedly made their escape in the gloom. When they reached the pavement they crowded in front of the door, blocking up the street and wondering what had caused the stampede.
"The
Captain glanced at his watch and remarked, '1:15, and still open. Come
on boys.' He followed up his remark by darting into the long hallway
leading to the [old] theater, followed by his officers. When
they reached the door the cry was raised and a rush was made for the
door, but two stalwart policemen closed and barred them tightly, and the
audience found themselves prisoners."
The Chronicle article is cited by Morgan G. Boyd on page 28 of his 2012 thesis "The Gold Mountain Theater Riots..."
On page 70 of his thesis, Boyd mentions an event in 1878 involving members of the Royal across the street protesting the New Theatre's practice of stealing performers by blocking its entrance. An October 19 Chronicle article titled "Almost a Celestial Riot" discussed tactics:
"These fellows were in the employ of the Royal Chinese Theater, and last evening they took up their positions in the doorway of the new Chinese Theater opposite, which opened a night or two since to the lovers of the Celestial drama and refused to allow any one entrance. A posse of policemen charged them with clubs, and they would scatter and return again to their positions. During the melee bricks and cobbles were freely used by the Mongols, and an incipient riot was only averted by the arrest of the thirty-three prime movers in this Mongolian project."
While earlier there had been many venues, by the 1890s the Chinese drama scene was reduced to just two theatres. This one on Jackson and the Grand Chinese on Washington St. For a fine discussion of the production style and the theatres see "The Chinese Drama," an eight page article by Frederick J. Masters from an 1895 issue of "The Chautauquan." It's on Google Books. Masters refers to this house as the Po Hing and notes it had 500 or 600 seats and was running on alternate weeks.
Also of interest is an article by Arthur Inkersley from the May 1898 issue of Strand magazine. That piece, including Strand's mis-labeled photos, is reproduced as a 2011 post on the Digital History Project site.
It was just listed as Chinese Theatre in the 1901 city directory. It still gets a listing in the 1905 edition of the city directory.
Interior views:
More information: See the timeline for pre-1906 Chinatown theatres down at the bottom of the page for the Grand Chinese, a venue on Washington St.
Other pre-1906 venues: Old Chinese / Hung Chien Guen / Royal, across the street at 626 Jackson | [New] Royal Chinese, 836 Washington | Grand Chinese - 814 Washington St. | Shanghai + Son Son Fong theatres - Dupont St. | Globe Hotel Chinese - Dupont at Jackson | Union/New Idea Theatre - Commercial St.
| back to top | pre-1906 theatre list | San Francisco Theatres: by address and neighborhood | alphabetical list | list by architect | home |
Superb piece. Have you ever considered publishing an article on this or other pre=1906 theaters for the scholarly journal of the Chinese Historical Society of America? Do let me know if you're interested, and I'll put you in touch with the journal's editor, Prof. Jonathan X. Lee. -- Doug Chan (president)
ReplyDeleteHi, Doug. Thanks, but not really interested. I'm swamped just keeping up with this site -- and a similar one for Los Angeles. But do feel free to share anything I've done. And if you come across anything I've missed please let me know so I can update the pages here. Cheers! -- Bill Counter
DeleteHi Bill: Thanks for your reply. One hopes that someday that you will be able to persuade the institution that they needn't rely on the Leslie magazine's misidentification. Do carry on with your fine work. Best wishes for the new Tiger Year.
DeleteWell, I'll leave that persuasion issue to you, Doug. It's certainly not a priority for me.
Delete